Wednesday, September 2, 2020

Scenario Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Situation - Essay Example Symond’s case will be talked about. To begin with, it will be talked about what the teleology and deontology areâ€followed by the definitions for ambush, battery, bogus detainment, and carelessness. The teleology of what happened, or what was the end procedure, was misuse. The deontology of what happened, or what was the obligation of obligationâ€were rules that were damaged. Ambush is characterized as a tort of brutality against somebody. Battery is characterized as unlawful physical contact (Staunton and Chiarella, Pp. 25). Bogus detainment is being held against one’s will. Carelessness is neglecting to follow up on one’s obligation of care. III. Hypothesis and Principle (300 words) Ms. Symond’s case is a great instance of senior maltreatment. As per Green (2003), â€Å"Despite developing worry about the issue, most nations have not passed explicit senior maltreatment legislation† (Green, Pp.118). In principle, and on a basic level, there ar e such a large number of things amiss with this circumstance that the rundown is apparently interminable. As to hypothesis and standards to be presented, there were such huge numbers of things amiss with this situation. The patient’s rights were damaged from various perspectives, which is the primary rule or hypothesis that, in view of an ethical model, would have been reprehensible had this occurred, all things considered, in a consideration settingâ€whether it be in the home, in the emergency clinic, or in a nursing home. Allison left no composed mandates with her association. As indicated by Breen et al. (2010), â€Å"In all instances†¦verbal guidelines must be affirmed recorded as a hard copy inside 24 hours or when is practicable† (Breen and Plueckhahn, Pp.288). Utilizing the ethical model, one sees that the different moral predicaments that are engaged with this whole outline which was set up to break down. Obviously, it isn't pragmatic that one attendant ought to have needed to manage a lady who was somewhat temperamental as Ms. Symond. In any case, that was no reason to leave the woman’s home, leaving her fundamentally vulnerable, while she (the new medical attendant, Allison) went to lunch and expected another person (a neighbor) to deal with poor Ms. Symond. Regardless, in view of the ethical model, Ms. Symond was done an express foul play. On a basic level, each and every individual who can be accused for her carelessness ought to be sued with each and every stripe of the law that concerns her circumstance. She was a casualty of senior maltreatment, and nobody ought to need to climate such a repulsive experienceâ€as it stands (Skene, Pp. 123). IV. Torts (900 words) Regarding torts, most importantly, the medical attendant named Allison ought to be accused of disregard because of her absence of obligation of care with respect to Ruth, the patient. She ought not have constrained any sort of treatment on Ruthâ€even on the off chance that she thought it was best for her to do a pressure dressing. Rather, Allison ought to have followed Ruth’s orders or wishes except if she didn't have the intensity of lawyer. It was extremely thoughtless of Allison to just reveal to Ruth that she would forget about her walker in the corridor till somebody returned around lunchtimeâ€a neighbor, no lessâ€to determine the status of her. That medical attendant was imprudent to such an extent that she ought to be deprived of her licensure because of that mess up. Subsequently, when attempting to go to the washroom, Ruth slipped and got a lacerationâ€which is a profound cutâ€on her head. This, yet Ruth was likewise taken care of via reckless paramedics who didn’t move her over to the proper consideration unit until she was found some time later, not having been gone to yet. Both on the pieces of Allison and the

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.